Use the dropdown to select a metric. The map and district ranking chart update together.
| Dataset | Sample Size & Region |
|---|---|
| Citizen survey conducted as part of an RCT for peer learning among ward members. | 9,699 citizens10 districts, Bihar |
| Census 2011 and Census 2001. | 8,392 GPsBihar |
| Endline Ward Member survey conducted as part of an RCT for peer learning among ward members. | 6,213 WMs10 districts, Bihar |
| 2011 Census data of villages. | 39,359 villagesBihar |
| SEC data. | 100,456 wardsBihar |
| NREGA MIS admin data. | 8,115 GPsBihar |
| SEC (Socio Economic Caste Census 2011-12) — ward candidate level 2016 elections; all SEC citizens matched with father; ward and mukhiya candidates matched with SEC census 2016. | 750,544 candidates · 2,800,000 citizens · 111,000 matchedBihar |
| PRD Department Bihar, Nischaysoft dataset — covers Nal Jal/Nali Gali 2016-2019. | 100,000+ wardsBihar |
| SEC, all Mukhiya winners 2016. | 7,148 MukhiyasBihar |
| GP level NREGA MIS admin data, 2021-2024. | 7,658 GPsBihar |
| UGP level dataset, 1991 population census. | 6,887 GPsBihar |
| GP level, source SEC 2006/2011/2016. | 8,392 GPsBihar |
Smaller GPs consistently outperform in terms of public goods, small-scale infrastructure, and welfare provision — but large-scale projects benefit from the economies of scale of larger GPs.
Use the dropdown to switch between outcomes. Map on the right shows the same outcome by district (same 5,000-20,000 population sample).
Use the dropdown to switch between outcomes. Map on the right shows the same outcome by district (same 5,000-20,000 population sample).
Use the dropdown to switch between outcomes. Map on the right shows the same outcome by district (same 5,000-20,000 population sample).
Use the dropdown to switch between outcomes. Map on the right shows the same outcome by district. NREGA Persondays is a raw bivariate relationship (no controls) — see note below the chart.
Ward size does not significantly impact ward member efficacy, infrastructure availment, or welfare outcomes.
Use the dropdown to switch between outcomes. Map on the right shows the same outcome by district (survey sample, not full census coverage).
Use the dropdown to switch between outcomes. Map on the right shows the same outcome by district (survey sample, not full census coverage).
Use the dropdown to switch between outcomes. Map on the right shows the same outcome by district (survey sample, not full census coverage).
Smaller GPs and wards have more educated Mukhiyas and Ward Members.
Mukhiya (GP head) winners, 2016 election, vs GP population. Block-FE controlled, GPs with 5,000-15,000 people.
Ward Member education vs ward population. Block-FE controlled.
Share of Ward Members with the Block Development Officer (BDO)'s phone number, vs GP population. Block-FE controlled, GPs with 5,000-20,000 people.